It's been a loooong time since I've done a site upgrade. This place was already looking pretty dated a few years ago, and time has not treated it well. It had gotten to where I hesitated to post links because I knew I'd get the inevitable "Comic sans? Really?", among other snarky comments. And of course the web has long since moved away from coloured backgrounds, even light ones; pretty much anything other than white (or off-white) is hard to find among sharp-looking websites. But if I was changing things, I wanted to do more than just a trivial font change and a switch to a white background; other elements of the layout reflected an older web, and the last time I did a doc crawl on this stuff it was still the heady early days of CSS2, so probably more than ten years ago. You might be surprised to learn this, but a lot has changed in ten years.
So I'm working on a new design. A few minor changes will roll out early (where they show up directly in the HTML), but I want to wait to slide in the new CSS until I've tested it on multiple browsers. Soon, though.
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects." --Robert Heinlein
Posted by blahedo at 2:05am on 19 Dec 20102.6!? As in, circa February 2003? Wow, I don't think you've got much of an upgrade path left there. That will be a fun project.
You're right that a facelift is the easy win, but I don't see it as orthogonal since you've stated a version upgrade is in the forecast anyway and any skinning changes you make now will likely be obsolete after an upgrade/migration and will need to be redone. Since any modern blog package will preclude the vast majority of the CSS changes you're probably making by hand, you'd be killing two birds with one very large, very unwieldy stone.
This is all philosophical debate, of course. Talking shop. Thanks for humoring me. Besides, I bet all you'd have to do is comment out a substr() call somewhere to enable "full feeds." ;-)
Posted by Brian at 2:52pm on 23 Dec 2010